Re: SDshare push

* Lars Heuer
> 
> Well, it's true that SDShare uses Atom, but SDShare would have been a
> much better specification if it would not depend on Atom; but that's
> another story.

While I was implementing SDshare push it struck me that there is another way to do it. Expose a URI endpoint (as with SDshare push) but define  parameters for server prefix and topic identity.

Then, for every change, POST the topic map fragment representing the change to the endpoint.

Done.

It's rather like an "update-topic" operation, except it uses the SDshare fragment update algorithm.

I suppose this would be more to the other Lars's taste. It certainly would be easy to implement. There's no APP, admittedly, but then there is no Atom either, so...

--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/