Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lars, On 2/28/2011 5:32 PM, Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, my attention was drawn to > <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1586.pdf>. > > Even if I try to restrain me: What are *direct* supertypes/subtypes? > Doesn't it withdraw everything we (should) know about TMDM, > type/instance relationships and about super-/subtypes relationships in > general? > I am assuming that like most slides, they make more sense with explanation. I have the same concern for instances, which are apparently just instances, slide 44 and then there are *direct* instances on slide 45. I know that Rani is planning on revised slides before Prague. Perhaps as we all have time, we can spot rough spots for either the slide revision or further explanations in Prague? Yes? Hope you are at the start of a great day! Patrick > Best regards, > Lars -- Patrick Durusau patrick-Q/[email protected] Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau