Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?
Benjamin Bock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Lars, On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Lars Heuer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > [...] >> It should even be possible to implement a TMAPI implementation on top >> of TMQL (for whoever wants that (-; ) > > Implementing TMAPI on top of TMQL is definitely no goal for TMQL. > > For sentimental reasons: > > * Goals for TMQL (defined 10 years ago): > <http://www1.y12.doe.gov/capabilities/sgml/sc34/document/0249.htm> > > * The update (defined 2 years later): > <http://www1.y12.doe.gov/capabilities/sgml/sc34/document/0448.htm> Maybe this is because TMAPI didn't exist back then? I think it is a goal today. Benjamin > Best regards, > Lars > -- > Semagia > <http://www.semagia.com> > > <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list > <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine > <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine > > _______________________________________________ topicmapmail mailing list [email protected] http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail