Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?
Robert Barta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Lars Heuer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If TMQL does not introduce a terminology for the distinction, then > >> something doubtful will arise because there *is* different ways how > >> to tackle this issue. Whatever choice you make on the defaults you > >> will have to support it with additional axis. Correct? Again: No. :-) RDF Query processors use external flags (controls, pragmas, ...) to allow the developer to specify "the amount of inferencing" to be used. I personally found this to be very workable. In a previous life one of the prettier editors (TMQL had many) proposed: http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmql/tmql.html#Pragmas I liked that. I mean the feature, not the editor... \rho