Re: TMQL: Direct (super|sub)types?

Am 05.03.2011 um 00:30 schrieb Benjamin Bock:

>>        s1 // types for all types,
>> 
>>        s1 / types for direct types
>> 
> 
> That didn't fit my initial mental model but maybe it's a good idea.
> I'll at that to my think-about-it list. Thanks.

Just for the records: When writing '//types', i feel like something is missing between the two slashes (also in XPATH). I prefer Andrew's first proposal '/*types' for 'all types', because the star has the connotation of 'deep' or 'transitive' for me. Yet, i find the current proposal '/types' for 'all types' and the less frequent (so longer is ok) '/direct-types' for direct types, very good.

Robert