Re: tolog for TMQL
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Robert Barta > > My concern was and is, that tolog-class languages have severe > limitations in terms of optimization opportunities (need too much > global knowledge and therefore cannot be easily parallelized). You've said this a number of times, but I must confess that I never had any idea what you base this claim on. I don't see the big difference. Why are tolog-like languages less parallelizable? --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/