Re: tolog for TMQL
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Rani, > The intention of the current editors is not at all to ignore Barta's > model. The opposite. Your slides mention (mathematical) sets. Where can I find them in the TMQL draft dtd. 2008? I cannot find them and tolog does not mention sets. Sets are nice as long as you think in TMDM/TMAPI terms (one topic map per query), but if you operate on 1..n topic maps, sets become expensive. Funnily, no operation mentioned at slide 68 [1] requires a mathematical set, but they mandate sets. [1] <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1586rev.pdf> Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> <https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine