Re: TMQL: Minor issue: Plurals for paths

Yes, [1] is missing a lot of parentheses. They're currently not optional.

If they were optional this would make your argument more obvious.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Lars Heuer <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
>> IMO there is a logical break; given that
>
>>     topic/tmdm:occurrence   # singular
>
>> yields the same result as
>
>>     topic/occurrences()     # plural
>
>
> The break becomes more obvious if it's allowed to omit the
> parentheses (which seems to be allowed acc. to [1]):
>
>
>    topic/occurrences
>
> vs.
>
>    topic/tmdm:occurrence
>
> or (if tmdm is the default namespace):
>
>    topic/occurrence
>
>
> [1] <http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1586rev.pdf>
>
> Best regards,
> Lars
> --
> Semagia
> <http://www.semagia.com>
>
> <https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
> <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
> <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
> _______________________________________________
> topicmapmail mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
>
_______________________________________________
topicmapmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail