Re: MaJorToM version 1.2.0 released

Hi Patrick,

[...]
> I don't know of any reason why "your" tests should not count.

Since I don't know MaJorToM well enough and maybe some tweaks exist to
make the engine faster. That's the reason why I emphasized "TMAPI
mode" and "memory backend". Benchmarks should always be taken with a
grain of salt since it's not very difficult to show that something is
slow.

> Is there a pointer to them so if a Topic Maps benchmark project did 
> happen they could be considered for inclusion?

I simply ran the CXTM test suite [1] against the memory backends of
Ontopia, MaJorToM, and tinyTiM.

[1] <http://cxtm-tests.sourceforge.net/>

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine