Re: SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2011 21:44:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Lars Heuer > > Last week discovered the SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol [1] and > I wondered if this wouldn't be a good alternative to SDShare [2]. > > [...] > > The protocol provides no fragments/snapshots like SDShare, though. So, in other words, you can't use it for what SDshare is used for. I'd say that's a clear "no" to the question of whether it's a good alternative to SDshare. :-) > Adding these functionality to the protocol would be interesting, I'd > think. I.e. each graph update would trigger a new fragment. Well, how would you get the fragments, and how would you find out which new fragments have appeared since the last time you asked? I don't see that this protocol helps you with these things, but maybe I missed something. (Of course, you can invent some way to do it yourself, but then you might as well just skip the graph store protocol.) --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/