Re: Convincing ordinary people

On 16.6.2011 16:20, Linda.Sutherland wrote:

---clip---
>
> If the TM community could develop something that's usable within a PC 
> running Windows, doesn't require more than basic computer know-how, 
> and allows indication of non-specific as well as specific 
> relationships between topics, I'm pretty sure you'd find interest 
> among back-of book indexers. The growth of the e-book market is one 
> area that could make it especially welcome - and I wouldn't be 
> surprised if smaller libraries didn't find uses for it too.

Hello Linda and all

Quite an interesting idea you have expressed. We -- as developers of 
Wandora topic map application -- are ready to take actions and add this 
"add an arbitrary (or should I say default) association" to a topic map. 
Of course, default association has default type and roles, and user can 
always change those later on when the nature of the association is 
clear. I wonder if there is a published subject identifier for this kind 
of default association type and roles?

I would love to hear also other concrete ideas about how to make topic 
map applications better. I am (I suppose a lot of people are) listening 
carefully.

Kind Regards,
Aki / Wandora Team



>
>
>
> Linda Sutherland
> linda.sutherland-k881bfVVboVWk0Htik3J/[email protected] 
> _______________________________________________
> topicmapmail mailing list
> topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
>