Re: Fwd: Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Oct 2011 02:04:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[...] > Probably my interpretation of 5. b) is too strong, but I'd suggest to > relax the paragraph "x isa x for no element of m" since it does not > hold true if a user thinks that x isa x is a good idea and the > limitation to the predefined TMRM environment isn't clear (to me). Furthermore I haven't heard an argument to disallow "x isa x" yet. Acc. to my understanding TMRM wouldn't loose anything: All navigation axes and all sections (constraints, legends etc.) would work. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine