Re: Fwd: Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation

Lars Heuer <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Oct 2011 02:04:51 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[...]
> Probably my interpretation of 5. b) is too strong, but I'd suggest to
> relax the paragraph "x isa x for no element of m" since it does not
> hold true if a user thinks that x isa x is a good idea and the
> limitation to the predefined TMRM environment isn't clear (to me).

Furthermore I haven't heard an argument to disallow "x isa x" yet.
Acc. to my understanding TMRM wouldn't loose anything: All navigation
axes and all sections (constraints, legends etc.) would work.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine