Re: Neo4j and Topic Maps
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:01:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Murray, I haven't looked at Graham and Kal's BrightstarDB, mostly because I would have to have a MS Server setup (as I understand it) and that I don't have. And probably not going to invest in the hardware/software to create such a platform. If you have or can obtain access to such a platform, I would love to hear about BrightstarDB. On Neo4j, I am curious what you think is required to write a "..new engine on top of Neo4j directly"? Being mindful that I don't think of "merging" as re-writing anything but presenting results to a user as though rewriting had occurred. That is one of the weaknesses of my diagram of a topic map tool chain. I under specified what would/could be done by a topic map engine. BTW, using Neoj would not be implementing the TMRM. That could be, not necessarily would be, implementing a different data model with different rules, from the TMDM. Hopefully disclosed so that the results could be merged with the results of using other legends. Hope you are having a great week! Patrick On 12/05/2011 06:21 PM, Murray Altheim wrote: > Hello. > > Patrick has blogged rather extensively[1] on Neo4j[2] but I'm > wondering if anyone has already started work on a Neo4j-based > Topic Map engine, or a backend for an existing Topic Map engine. > I realise I might make some people squirm if I suggested I was > considering implementing a backend for TM4j (given its status). > > A more favourable idea might be implementing a backend for Ontopia > or writing a new engine on top of Neo4j directly. The latter could > be a lot more work and would fail to take advantage of all of > Ontopia's other infrastructure but could also be more suitable if > one only had a requirement for providing an engine, or if one were > interested in implementing the TMRM instead of the TMDM. > > Anyone already started on something like this in open source, or > planned open source? I hate to reinvent any wheels. > > Murray > > [1] http://tm.durusau.net/?cat=155 > [2] http://neo4j.org/ > ........................................................................... > > Murray Altheim <murray10 at altheim dot com> = > = === > http://www.altheim.com/murray/ > === === > SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = > = === > > Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes, > Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light, > The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses, > Knock at any door - there's one who will respond. > -- The Blue Cliff Record > _______________________________________________ > topicmapmail mailing list > topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected] > http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail > -- Patrick Durusau patrick-Q/[email protected] Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) OASIS Technical Advisory Board (TAB) - member Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau