Re: Result set requirements

* [email protected]
| 
| declare default subjectIndicator
| namespace="http://psi........com/defaultpsi/#"
| [...]

Hmmmm. Interesting. This is similar to what I thought of, though I was
thinking of recycling the LTM syntax, something like this:

  evaluate
    now-associated-in-new-way-that-we-just-found-out($A : role1, $B : role2)
  for
    were-already-associated-in-way-one($A : role1, $C : role3),
    were-already--associated-in-way-two($C : role2, $B : role14)?

It's of course also possible to do things like 5.4.1, but I suspect it
would be rather cumbersome. It's too late at night for me to give it a
real try right now.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >