Re: Result set requirements

* Robert Barta
| 
| I do not think that DOM2 constructors will make us happy ;-)

DOM is just evil, and DOM2 doubly so. Using the syntax is waaay
better.
 
| For TM it is ....hmmmm?

I think we should seriously consider the AsTMa* path of making a
compact interchange syntax as the basis for the QL and then use that
for the constructors as well (if we do decide to have constructors).
 
| Of course I used AsTMa= for AsTMa? All other approaches will have to
| come up with some syntax as well.

Yeah. It's best if we can make all these syntaxes consistent.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >