Re: How to proceed with TMQL?

* Steve Pepper
| 
| Each author
| 
| 1. Presents an overview of his language.
| 
| 2. Presents a list of the reasons why *his* language
|    is a better starting point for TMQL than the others.
| 
| 3. Says which of the other proposals he likes best, and
|    why. (Maybe ranks each of the others.)
| 
| 4. Lists the features that he would like to incorporate
|    into his own language from the other languages in order
|    to make it more complete.

I buy this.

(Robert's objection is of course valid, though I don't think it really
applies here. If we can't make feature X from language Y fit nicely
into language Z there's nothing here to say that we have to hammer it
in.)

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >