Re: First TMQL WD published

Could this be a possibility?

On Thursday 24 February 2005 11:01 am, Michael Chapman wrote:
> Yes, please, I think that would be most valuable (and I do appreciate the
> extra input/work that it will create/cause).
>
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 1:11 pm, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> > If people feel that a kind of tutorial or set of examples is necessary
> > in order to comment, please let us know.
>

And ... apologies for pushing ... but at least it shows there is a community 
out here watching/waiting on developments ;-)>    MC