Re: TM is TMQL output

Robert Barta <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Jul 2003 19:29:08 +1000

Newsgroups	gmane.text.xml.xtm.tmql
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> This brings up something new: do we need a concept of a fragment
> syntax for topic maps, like what SGML/XML has? I'm not sure exactly
> where we'd put it in the standards landscape, but it does sound like
> something that would be useful. Comments on this? Should we mention it
> in the requirements document?

Can you explain this idea a bit more?

\rho