Re: TMQL Issue: Functions and Predicates as first-class topics
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:42:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.tmql |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Lars Heuer > > - The TM-ish style adds some syntactic noise to functions / predicates Yes. IMHO this is an important point, and it's why I'm opposed to this. This is a real downside, and the benefits to using CTM are negligible for the users of TMQL. > - Slower to parse I don't think we really care about this. Parsing speed is unlikely to be a serious challenge for TMQL, and in any case I think you'd find it hard to prove that the CTM syntax really is slower. > - Scope? > The examples I've seen so far are all in the unconstrained scope. > What happens if the type-instance relationship is scoped? Under > which conditions are the functions / predicates are executed? Argh! It would be nice if we didn't have to think about that. --Lars M.