Re: TM is TMQL output
Thomas Schwotzer <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:48:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.tmql |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Schwotzer wrote: > Hi. > I work on a sytem with distributed TM Engine > and follow a centralized approach. > > I have a - so called - central station > that holds the main knowledge base. Decentral, e.g. > mobile engines retrieve - from time to time - > fragments that are of interest for users > or at a given location. > > Thus, subsets of topic maps must be submitted. > Since I read Lars paper I call it fragments. > > I attach a paper with some ideas. (Paper is > submitted to a workshop but not accepted.) Oooops, I forgot a single word: It is not YET accepted. I hope it will :-) > > I follow the TMQL discussion because I'm curious > to see if a query language can substitute an > fragmentation algorithm. > > Regards, Thomas > > Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > >> * Robert Barta >> | >> | [fragment syntax for topic maps] >> | | Can you explain this idea a bit more? >> >> Essentially, what I mean is what is described in: >> <URL: http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/xtm-fragments.html > >> >> It doesn't have to be exactly the same as that proposal, but something >> that performs the same kind of task. >> > -- Thomas Schwotzer University of Technology Berlin Intelligent Networks and Management of Distributed Systems http://ivs.tu-berlin.de/Schwotzer fon: +49-30-314-79833 fax: +49-30-314-24573