Re: yaml for java ...

"Thom Nelson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I had the same experience, it looked like JvYaml was the preferred library
but JYaml seems usable and has much better docs.  However, it's support for
different input/output methods, particularly streams and readers/writers,
needs some work, as I had to do things like:

System.out.println(Yaml.dump(doc));

instead of using the proper APIs.  Also, I had to write my own simple stream
chunking, as the JYaml code didn't appear to be working.  However, the
complete lack of docs for JvYaml, as well as its dormant state, makes it way
less attractive.  On the other hand, it is a 1.1 compliant parser, which is
possibly why the Yaml home page points to it.  There's nothing on the JYaml
page that says what version of Yaml it supports, which probably means it's
still 1.0.  (Someone please correct any of my statements as I am still very
new to Yaml.)

- Thom

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:22 PM, George, Lal <[email protected]> wrote:

> At one time there was mention of JYaml on the YAML website, however it
> is no longer mentioned but JvYaml seems to have been added instead as
> current projects. However, the last release of JvYaml is Sept. 2006,
> which doesn't seem like a current project, whereas the last release of
> JYaml is Sept. 2007.
>
> Three questions:
>
>        1. Why isn't JYaml mentioned any more?
>        2. What is the development status of JvYaml? Is it being
> actively supported?
>        3. What is the Yaml implementation of choice for Java?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best,
>   Lal
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - - -
>
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient
> of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
> communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
> an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
> product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
> statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information
> is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All
> information is subject to change without notice.
>
> --------
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
> Please be advised that any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained within
> this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to
> be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. tax
> related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
> party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Yaml-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Yaml-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.