Question on s-l+flow-in-block

Joshua Choi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
To the YAML 1.2 spec writers,

In the current draft, rule #196, s-l+flow-in-block, requires
s-l-comments at the end. s-l-comments in turn requires either
s-b-comment or the start of the line, and s-b-comment requires
b-non-content. The required presence of b-non-content, which is
equivalent to b-break, means the following two streams are invalid if
they do not end with a break:

I am a document. This stream is going to end abruptly with NO line break.

I am a document. # This stream is still invalid if this stream halts
without a break.

...while both of them are valid if they do end with breaks.

Perhaps the s-l-comments in s-l+flow-in-block should be marked
optional, or at least something should be changed to make
b-non-content optional in the end it's not at the beginning of a line.

Sincerely,
Joshua Choi

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.