Question on s-l+flow-in-block
Joshua Choi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To the YAML 1.2 spec writers, In the current draft, rule #196, s-l+flow-in-block, requires s-l-comments at the end. s-l-comments in turn requires either s-b-comment or the start of the line, and s-b-comment requires b-non-content. The required presence of b-non-content, which is equivalent to b-break, means the following two streams are invalid if they do not end with a break: I am a document. This stream is going to end abruptly with NO line break. I am a document. # This stream is still invalid if this stream halts without a break. ...while both of them are valid if they do end with breaks. Perhaps the s-l-comments in s-l+flow-in-block should be marked optional, or at least something should be changed to make b-non-content optional in the end it's not at the beginning of a line. Sincerely, Joshua Choi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects