Re: YAML 1.2 spec question: absence of in-flow in flow mapping entries

Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, this definitely needs to be fixed. I'll do that together with the final
line break fix.

Thanks!

    Oren Ben-Kiki

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Joshua Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ...

I have another question, this time pertaining to rule #139,
> c-flow-mapping(n,c). I think that instead of:
>  “{” s-separate(n,c)?
>  ns-s-flow-map-entries(n,c)? “}”
>
> ...it should be:
>  “{” s-separate(n,c)?
>  ns-s-flow-map-entries(n,in-flow(c))? “}”

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects

_______________________________________________
Yaml-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.