Re: utf8u tag proposal
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, > The first group consists of all the existing tags in the > repository except for !!binary, !!null and !!utf8u. They > specify the data type of a node. I wondered if I should > classify !!merge, !!value and !!yaml to this group but > I at last understood they define special classes whose > instance is used only when we need some placeholder for > the key of a special key-value-pair in a mapping. > > The second group consists of !!binary and !!utf8u, and > possibly !!null. These Tags do not specify the data type > but the way of encoding the native data into its string > expression. I missed the point that the Tags in the first group also specifies the encoding procedure. So, I should have written that the Tags in the first group specify both the data type and the encoding procesure, while those in the second does not specify the data type but specify an (alternative) encoding procesure. Best, Osamu TAKEUCHI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf