Re: YAML compared to MGraph

According to the rumor mill
http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/08/quadrant-drops Microsoft
is not really pushing it.
The M model isn't identical to YAML's (e.g., collections are unsorted and
arrays are second class).
M isn't a superset of JSON, YAML is.
M is tightly coupled with the Microsoft ecosystem.
There are plenty or differences...

Have fun,

    Oren Ben-Kiki

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jakob Voss <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I stumbled upon Microsoft's "M" aka project Oslo which includes the
> MGraph language. It is often compared with XML but looks much more like
> YAML. Has anyone had a look at it and compared it with YAML? Some good
> introductions:
>
> http://startbigthinksmall.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/mgraph-the-next-xml/
> http://blog.jclark.com/2008/11/some-thoughts-on-oslo-modeling-language.html
>
> Jakob
>
>
> --
> Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG)
> Digitale Bibliothek - Jakob Voß
> Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1
> 37073 Goettingen - Germany
> +49 (0)551 39-10242
> http://www.gbv.de
> [email protected]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Yaml-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Yaml-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core