Sponsorship
Trans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've noticed that many other widely useful software technologies tend to have corporate sponsors, sometimes even with in-house development teams dedicated to the technologies further development. Why has YAML never garnered such support? To me it seems like one of the best candidates for such an endeavor -- It's an insanely useful technology, it's has cross-platform capabilities, and the specification is pretty much solid. A sponsored development group could do a lot of good -- they could help make sure the different implementations are compatible, that missing implementation get built, and help drive YAML's future. This has come to my mind right now b/c I am having an issue were I am generating some data with Ruby that I want to read back into a Javascript program. But there is no full implementation of YAML for Javascript, and there do not seem to be any good alternatives. I can't use JSON b/c it lacks anchors and referencing. JSYNC is still too immature and has even less in the way of implementation. So I feel stuck and can't help but wonder why things should be in such a state after so long. Might this be something we could pursue? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev