Sponsorship

Trans <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I've noticed that many other widely useful software technologies tend
to have corporate sponsors, sometimes even with in-house development
teams dedicated to the technologies further development. Why has YAML
never garnered such support? To me it seems like one of the best
candidates for such an endeavor -- It's an insanely useful technology,
it's has cross-platform capabilities, and the specification is pretty
much solid. A sponsored development group could do a lot of good --
they could help make sure the different implementations are
compatible, that missing implementation get built, and help drive
YAML's future.

This has come to my mind right now b/c I am having an issue were I am
generating some data with Ruby that I want to read back into a
Javascript program. But there is no full implementation of YAML for
Javascript, and there do not seem to be any good alternatives. I can't
use JSON b/c it lacks anchors and referencing. JSYNC is still too
immature and has even less in the way of implementation. So I feel
stuck and can't help but wonder why things should be in such a state
after so long.

Might this be something we could pursue?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.