Re: When did YAML become a derivative work of JSON?

Isn't this due to the desire to have all JSON files be valid YAML files? 
If that is desired then I see no way to avoid referring to JSON.

Trans wrote:
> I was reading through the Specification today (http://www.yaml.org/
> spec/1.2/spec.html), something I hadn't done in some time, and found
> it rather curious that JSON has taken such a prominent role in the
> specs. I understand having a section to discuss the relationship
> between YAML and JSON, but not some of the references that appear to
> actually co-op aspects of the JSON spec for YAML.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2