Re: A beginning of a YPath spec
Trans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 6, 9:15 am, Peter Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Trans (and YAML-Core in General), > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Trans <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Any progress on this? > > > Ruby 1.9.x is posed to go mainstream soon and I'm a bit worried about > > it b/c it drops Syck YAML library, which has basic YPath support, in > > favor of Psych library, which does not. So a new YPath solution is > > needed soon. > > Sorry - things got delayed at my end. Several things intervened, > including visiting my sister in the UK for a marriage ceremony. Not > that that's a bad thing, obviously. ;-) > > I hope to have a basic syntax available by Sunday, Brisbane time. I > need to test some ideas first before rolling out a doc. Awesome. I'm just happy that it's being worked on! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2