Fwd: YAML Schema Feedback

Trans <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.yaml.general
Message-ID <CAEu+kw2rhtWWpDi1QhLjhO1tp0zCO3MEdCuv8WZY_sM67i7SEQ@mail.gmail.com>
I see that I forgot to include an important point: Given that a complete
tag resolution mechanism (specification + reference implementation) exists,
the schema itself can be much simpler, since some structural information
would be given by the presence of a tag. In the YES example, Charlie Adams
and Julie Ann Rose could be tagged as <person>, and the schema would be
reduced to an expression that said: <person> nodes only.

I am aware that this might mess up things, but I think there is a need for
a tag resolution language to enable proper construction, regardless of the
use of schema.

Best regards,

-- 
Mvh / Kind regards

*Roy Brokvam*
Senior systemutvikler | Senior Developer
+ 47 48 04 16 60 | [email protected] <[email protected]>

*Dossier Solution**s*
Rådhusgata 30 B | NO-0151 Oslo | +47 22 11 20 90 | www.dossier.no

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs

_______________________________________________
Yaml-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.