PyYAML Analysis
Tom Kent <teeks99-/[email protected]> Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:53:56 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.yaml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAArKS8jxJhYwgkVQD8uXGbeHgUqsQou=uZGersFw37JLKOm1Hw@mail.gmail.com> |
The PyYAML page says that it doesn't have a separate list, and references this list. Sorry if this is not of interest to many on here. I, along with a group of masters students at Penn State, recently completed a class on software testing. For this class we had to pick an open source project and subject it to various forms of software testing. We chose the PyYAML library, and wanted to make the results available to the PyYAML community. All of our work is available from our github repository: https://github.com/PSU-SW581-S16-T3/pyyaml-test Including our final report: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PSU-SW581-S16-T3/pyyaml-test/master/FinalReport.pdf We tested the Python 3 version, and a lot of the low-level test was focused on the serialization section. As this was only a 7 week class, we did not attempt to be comprehensive in our testing, rather we tried lots of different methods, applied to parts of the total library. In general we found that the PyYAML library was largely defect free. The only issues we uncovered don't seem to cause end-user errors in any circumstances. I hope that I will be able to use PyYAML for a future project! Sincerely, Tom Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Yaml-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core