Re: Software RAID efficiency: Disks vs partitions

Aniruddha Shankar <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:19:09 +0530

Newsgroups	gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
Message-ID	<CANWe03Hz0B9+rxXSRYXYGM_5jvamjzv0+YshuC6=A2WUG2BKsQ@mail.gmail.com>

At the risk of inflaming this discussion, I'm having a really good
experience with my ZFS on Debian GNU/Linux storage pool - 4x1TB hard disks
on a middle age desktop PC. Mine runs on whole disks.

cheers

Karim

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Gora Mohanty <gora-ZIIawUy8V/u1Z/[email protected]> wrote:

> On 26 April 2014 22:50, Gora Mohanty <gora-ZIIawUy8V/u1Z/[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did some tests between various scenarios: RAID-10/RAID-6
> > with three 3TB disks, and RAID-6 with 12 1TB partitions, using:
>
> Sorry, make that four three TB disks, and 12 1TB partitions. Also,
> my numbers do not quite jibe with the table in
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels
>
> Regards,
> Gora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ilugd mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
>