Re: Re: IEDR non-reaction to misleading domain registrations

This could be considered a 'bad faith' registration of a domain, and as
such may be revoked.
Also:
http://gdn.domains/039repeal-the-eighth039-websites-that-redirect-to-pro-life-pages-039do-not-break-any-rules039/

For a formal challenge, IEDR dispute resolution is outsourced to WIPO,
which appears to mean that any challenger must:
(a) demonstrate that THEY have a right to the domain and
(b) pay the €1,500 challenge fee and wait for 21 days for an outcome from
the WIPO panel.

Specifically (from https://www.iedr.ie/blog/how-to-appeal-a-ie-registration/
):

"In order to remain impartial, the IEDR uses an independent third-party
arbiter for disputes; the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
Anyone filing a complaint to WIPO must prove three things to them. Firstly
that they have a right to the disputed domain. Secondly that the current
registrant does not have any claim or legitimate interests in the domain.
And finally, why the domain should be considered as having been registered
or used in bad faith.

In order for a complaint to be considered valid, it must also comply with
these rules: http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/rules/ie.html "


In this circumstance, given there will be a referendum surrounding this,
and rules about balanced and fair provision of information, I wonder if the
IEDR would be willing to suspend the domains and hold them as
unregisterable - so neither side gets them. Both already have a single
registered .ie domain and website, with clear, unambiguous names.

This might be an interesting request both to the IEDR and the referendum
commission, except there doesn't appear to be a referendum commission
established for this issue yet.

Best regards,
-->Gar


2018-01-27 19:41 GMT+01:00 John McCormac <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Saturday, 27 January 2018 18:05:16 UTC, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>>
>> It has been repeatedly reported to the IEDR, and they decided it was OK.
>> If somebody has contacts in there, or in related bodies, it would be
>> great to have some signal amplification, so this stops.
>>
>> If the registrations are in accordance with IEDR regulations, then
> there's nothing much to be done. Neither side has a monopoly on terms used
> for domain names as there are no trademarks or intellectual property
> issues. It seems that one side just registered domain names before the
> other side did.
>
> Regards...jmcc
>
> --
> Irish Linux Users Group
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ILUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/linux.ie/group/ilug/.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/
> linux.ie/d/msgid/ilug/11e83904-7fc3-40cb-9c85-5136248c3da7%40linux.ie
> <https://groups.google.com/a/linux.ie/d/msgid/ilug/11e83904-7fc3-40cb-9c85-5136248c3da7%40linux.ie?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>



-- 
Gareth 'bigbro' Eason

-- 
Irish Linux Users Group
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ILUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/linux.ie/group/ilug/.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/linux.ie/d/msgid/ilug/CAD4VSdjSyZcE%3DPqkwmrpY%3DPKdG6txyoNrrNx%3DuCXZqee3cbXyg%40mail.gmail.com.