Re: [LIG] [ilugd] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[email protected]> Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:05:30 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.india.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | -ENOENT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Raj is not. I am - on a personal server that happens to host the ilugd list. Choice of distro mostly due to the guy who did a remote hands install for my box having only one current distro handy that had a usable version of the tg3 gigabit ethernet driver. And yes, aware of this, I tend to follow a "install a restricted set of packages and patch only when absolutely necessary" policy that, e&oe this little contretemps with a broken mailman, has, knock on wood, worked fine so far. srs > > Why are you using Ubuntu for production servers? Look how many major > releases they have had vs. Debian, or RHEL. They push out the latest > version of the software as fast as possible because that is what their > user base wants. That's why I use Ubuntu on my desktops. But they can't > possibly keep the same quality control on such a release cyle. For > production servers I use Debian, except when a client requires > enterprise support, then I use RHEL. I suggest the same. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/