[LIP] Re: [TwinCLinG] Insmod Rmmod Insmod crash.

Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.india.programmers
Organization KCircle - http://www.kcircle.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
suresh kumar  [2/7/2004 12:38 PM] :

> Hi,
> I have written a module that crashes after insmod followed by rmmod followed by insmod. I am using kgdb and the crash is as below. When I do rmmod I am not freeing the memory that is I have allocated during the insmod. I want to know if it is because of that or it is because of wrong programming in registering netfilter hooks as the trace is showing that. I am also pasing few lines as how I am registering. Kindly help me. I feel that there is some thing to do with the priority of the hook. 

This might explain why ...

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/1/27/32

> 
> SIGSEGV has to be actually delivered to an application for it to die. A user 
> has a choice of correcting a bug on the fly and let the application continue 
> without segfaulting. It can tell gdb to continue the debugee without a 
> signal. It doesn't apply in case of kernel, so it's not a bug. Kernel anyway 
> "delivers" the signal, that is, continues with a panic once kgdb returns. We 
> don't offer a user the choice of correcting a segfault on the fly.




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.