Re: Anti-Virus
Nathan Cerny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.kansascity |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC06Usudh5djaAu4+QzUX3nB1wDbLE9ousEMQhhB4Vi-9E08Uw@mail.gmail.com> |
I ran Security Essentials for a few months until I got real virus protection...it'll protect against anything known, but has no hueristics, so it's not any good against new things. If you are using the internet safely, and aren't using your systems inappropriately (thus, probably wouldn't get a virus anyway), then it's probably sufficient. But if you want to protect against the accidental click or getting files from shady sources, get NOD32. It's relatively cheap and well worth it. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:55 PM, <jimsissel-/[email protected]> wrote: > You said Microsoft and adequate in the same sentence. > > Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins-ZRzwtDF0/[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:52:30 > To: KCLUG (E-mail)<[email protected]> > Subject: Anti-Virus > > Is Microsoft Security Essentials adequate protection for small office > systems > behind a dd-wrt router? > _______________________________________________ > KCLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug > _______________________________________________ > KCLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug > -- Nathan Cerny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup, Danish computer scientist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ KCLUG mailing list [email protected] http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug