Re: whimsy: sleep as version control check-in
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.kansascity |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJfD9RQYTr8Bn5YXP7gT+thY1LMwoJe5CR_=OA5bCSztZrybKg@mail.gmail.com> |
Well, writes are the same as commits, and reads are checkouts. So you could probably write gitFS as a fuse module. More seriously, I know plenty of people who keep their homedir in git and a user crontab to make nightly commits. When they're ready to push, there's a bit of rebasing required, but its not strictly nessecary. Justin On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Nicol <[email protected]> wrote: > > In a continuous improvement paradigm, what granularity does one check in? > > Are rollbacks possible in real life, outside of prices in walmart > commercials? > > At the granularity of Day, in which a day is an application one installs on > rising, operates for many hours, and then saves to persistent storage and > shuts down, where does this metaphor intersect with version control? > > Please discuss. (or flame off-list) > > > -- > "Don't believe everything you read on the internet just because there's a > picture with a quote next to it" -- Xunzi, 241 B.C. > > _______________________________________________ > KCLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug _______________________________________________ KCLUG mailing list [email protected] http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug