Re: Why plain-text rule is necessary on the LUG mailing list was -> Re: A reminder and request to all LUG members
Kushal Das <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.kolkata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Debayan Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote: > Among the people who have sent mails to this list include yourself, > Indranil da and Debarshi. No one else posted too many mails here. > Reason? This HTML rule. > So my point is that very few people actually respond to any mails here > and that is not because they are sleepy or dont care but because of > this rule. Are you sure of this ? Almost all mailing lists follow NO-HTML rule specifically. > I under estimated myself earlier. I have more arguments infact. All I > say is mails/discussions in this list increase by a factor of 10 > if you remove this policy. So many other lists allow HTML for a > reason. I would have supported bouncing off HTML mails if this were > the kernel-devel list or some elite hacker list where people are > already into the culture from a long time participate. Clearly, this > is not such a list. One look at the archives clearly tells me that > this list has had no discussion at all in the past 4 months. I cant > see how that is good in anyway. > > And you asking me for a list of mails in support is too much to ask > right now, but I can amass it in a few days if you so demand. One really does not need to be elite hacker to understand the importance of text based emails. Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in _______________________________________________ Ilug-cal-discuss mailing list Ilug-cal-discuss-PMNjqutUrVNkNBGiPgg+Odi2O/[email protected] http://list.ilug-cal.org/mailman/listinfo/ilug-cal-discuss