Re: Why plain-text rule is necessary on the LUG mailing list was -> Re: A reminder and request to all LUG members
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.kolkata |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Debayan Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/3/23 Shreyank Gupta <[email protected]>: >> I am for the NO-HTML rule. >> My reason may seem slightly selfish, but I like a clean Inbox. >> The ILUG-CAL list is one of the few lists I don't filter, because of >> its quality mails. I like to have all its mails directly to my Inbox. >> Kudos to IDG for maintaining it so well. > Do help out by posting to this list once in a while too. A larger problem of less traffic on mailing lists is observed on the *UGs at institutions. A response of "my room is # on hall @" becomes the stop -point of all conversations. The solution might be provided, but it ends up not being archived. That ends up making interactions person dependent. -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ Ilug-cal-discuss mailing list Ilug-cal-discuss-PMNjqutUrVNkNBGiPgg+Odi2O/[email protected] http://list.ilug-cal.org/mailman/listinfo/ilug-cal-discuss