Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )

Karanbir Singh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi John,

On 04/24/2012 11:30 AM, John Edwards wrote:
>> I think there is merit on both sides. Encryption works to some level to
>> mitigate the idea of data being worth something to anyone else other
>> than the key holder, but then on the flip side you need  key instance in
>> the cloud in order to consume the data locally anyway.
> Data can be encrypted in storage (disks) and transit (network), but
> I don't think it can be encrypted in memory if you want to use it.

right, thats what I meant about needing the key used for encryption
needing to be available locally if there is going to be a need to
process the data locally in the cloud.

> That means that a superuser on virtual host can read the memory
> of any guest machine. That will include a lot of unencrypted
> sensitive data, although it would not be easy to sort through.

so yes, need to trust hypervisor - but in some cases, also trust all
your neighbours to some degree. its been possible to bring down a
physical machine from inside a xen domU.

Also, since the state of what is visible inside the domU is controlled (
and potentially manipulated ) from the physical host, it makes things a
lot less secure.

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219    | Yahoo IM: z00dax      | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
--
Gllug mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.