Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )
Karanbir Singh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi John, On 04/24/2012 11:30 AM, John Edwards wrote: >> I think there is merit on both sides. Encryption works to some level to >> mitigate the idea of data being worth something to anyone else other >> than the key holder, but then on the flip side you need key instance in >> the cloud in order to consume the data locally anyway. > Data can be encrypted in storage (disks) and transit (network), but > I don't think it can be encrypted in memory if you want to use it. right, thats what I meant about needing the key used for encryption needing to be available locally if there is going to be a need to process the data locally in the cloud. > That means that a superuser on virtual host can read the memory > of any guest machine. That will include a lot of unencrypted > sensitive data, although it would not be easy to sort through. so yes, need to trust hypervisor - but in some cases, also trust all your neighbours to some degree. its been possible to bring down a physical machine from inside a xen domU. Also, since the state of what is visible inside the domU is controlled ( and potentially manipulated ) from the physical host, it makes things a lot less secure. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -- Gllug mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug