Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )
John Hearns <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPqNE2UERHukMSCwZ-H7AZG9jkRJUSHcdNNaUngEoWDnWEy+Eg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 24/04/2012, JLMS <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 April 2012 09:23, Tethys <[email protected]> wrote: > > You can also use thousands of cores to throw at a problem for a few > thousand pounds instead of expending hundreds of thousands or even > millions of pounds on a system of comparable power. I very much agree with you there. Especially in the biosciences market, cloud is being pushed as a solution for problems like gene sequencing. As a for instance, see this article on a 50 000 core machine which was assembled as a demo on Amazon: http://www.hpcinthecloud.com/hpccloud/2012-04-24/cycle_spins_up_50_000-core_cluster_in_amazon_cloud.html Cloud also is very good for companies which have a 'bursty' workload. You might have workstations and storage within your company, and the software packages you need to do some design or simulation work. When your consultancy wins a contract to (say) simulate vehicle crashes you could hire cloud resources to do that. Software vendors are already providing on-demand licenses which can be accessed via a web server and a key, rather than the tradiational model of running a Flexlm server within your company (yes, I know you can VPN tunnel etc.) I can think of one well-known company based in west London which does just this sort of on-demand licensing. Also re. assembling supercomputers on the cloud, I was very impressed by a short talk from Amazon at the Intel Sandybridge launch in London. They now provide large machine instances with a 10 gigabit connection, which you need if you are going to run parallel MPI type codes across many systems. -- Gllug mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug