Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )
JLMS <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD7yA7xYxSfoFcHjD5JT3oe6z425H2+z2GqePJ-O89Kn_Zq=3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 25 April 2012 10:31, Bernard Peek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24/04/12 23:07, JLMS wrote: > > You can also use thousands of cores to throw at a problem for a few > thousand pounds instead of expending hundreds of thousands or even > millions of pounds on a system of comparable power. > > > That's correct but misleading. You can rent a vast number of cores for a > limited period for less than the cost of building a comparable hardware > solution. > > If you intend to use a vast number of cores for a very long time then it's > still cheaper to buy rather than rent. Except that if you build the system > yourself you have it on the books as an asset that you can only write down > at a rate agreed by the tax man. Cloud solutions are always paid for from > the operating budget not the capital budget. That has tax advantages, until > the Chancellor changes the rules again. > > -- > Bernard Peek > [email protected] > Absolutely. There are many things for which using a cloud solution is not optimal, but dismissing the option off hand looks reckless to me. -- Gllug mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug