Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )

JLMS <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug
Message-ID <CAD7yA7wduKc-4Lq+RWp0Y5cm_Bs6UTN0fV2Fr0R1sSM1kKqR5Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 27 April 2012 23:48, James Courtier-Dutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2012 5:01 PM, "Richard W.M. Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:24:47AM +0100, JLMS wrote:
>> > The question is: if all your data and communications are properly
>> > secured (encrypted disks in Red Hat, Solaris work quite well for
>> > example, and with SSDs and forever more powerful machines the
>> > traditional technical penalties for encrypting are becoming less of an
>> > issue), what exactly would be wrong with having your data in the so
>> > called cloud?
>>
>> Unless you've worked out an efficient homomorphic encryption scheme, I
>> have to tell you that encrypting the disks on your cloud machines
>> makes not the slightest bit of difference to the security of your
>> cloud data.
>>
>
> Encrypting disks provides protection for "data at rest"
> i.e. It protects when the computer is switched off. So in the cloud it
> protects when the vm instance is shut down.
> I agree, that for a cloud based always on service, not a lot of time is
> spent in the off state.
>
>

But one is supposed to be encrypting communications also (VPN, ssh, SSL, etc).

I don't see what is left uncovered ...
--
Gllug mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.