Re: Cloud computing ( was Re: Linux Petition )
JLMS <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.london.gllug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD7yA7wduKc-4Lq+RWp0Y5cm_Bs6UTN0fV2Fr0R1sSM1kKqR5Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 27 April 2012 23:48, James Courtier-Dutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2012 5:01 PM, "Richard W.M. Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:24:47AM +0100, JLMS wrote: >> > The question is: if all your data and communications are properly >> > secured (encrypted disks in Red Hat, Solaris work quite well for >> > example, and with SSDs and forever more powerful machines the >> > traditional technical penalties for encrypting are becoming less of an >> > issue), what exactly would be wrong with having your data in the so >> > called cloud? >> >> Unless you've worked out an efficient homomorphic encryption scheme, I >> have to tell you that encrypting the disks on your cloud machines >> makes not the slightest bit of difference to the security of your >> cloud data. >> > > Encrypting disks provides protection for "data at rest" > i.e. It protects when the computer is switched off. So in the cloud it > protects when the vm instance is shut down. > I agree, that for a cloud based always on service, not a lot of time is > spent in the off state. > > But one is supposed to be encrypting communications also (VPN, ssh, SSL, etc). I don't see what is left uncovered ... -- Gllug mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug