Re: Sympatico update

james terris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Years ago, the town house that I was moving to could not get dsl
service (I can't remember the exact reason but it wasn't line problems). 
The ISP I was trying to subscribe with told me that 
getting Bell to fix the problem for them was going to be difficult
and take quite a while but if I signed up with Sympatico first
they would fix the problem quickly since I was a Sympatico customer
at that point. After they fixed it I was able to switch over to 
the other ISP... lol

--- On Wed, 12/23/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [oclug] Sympatico update
> To: "General Membership Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 9:42 AM
> I was in the same boat as
> Garth.  It was a total disaster with me as well. 
> Billing me when I had no service.  Avoid 3web,
> cybersurf, etc.
> 
> As for Sympatico, my father-in-law is attempting to upgrade
> from dial-up 
> to high speed in the new year (yes he is a little behind
> the times).  He 
> called his current ISP and they checked his two phone lines
> for DSL 
> service.  Both could have the service but there is no
> space left in the 
> DSLAM.  So, he called Sympatico.  They will sign
> him up no problem.  How 
> can that be?  What is Bell doing?  Are they
> keeping space in the DSLAM for 
> Sympatico and screwing the smaller ISPs?  Or maybe
> they kick off a 
> competitor's customer's service to free up a spot for a new
> Sympatico 
> customer?
> 
> I advised him against Symaptico because I think Bell is
> scum.  However, 
> Rogers is also scum.
> 
> I have only heard good things about Teksavvy but I believe
> they are also 
> at the mercy of scummy Bell with regards to the DSLAM and
> would 
> potentially put him in the same boat as I was in with (in
> order) Magma, 
> IStop, Cybersurf (bought customers from IStop) all of which
> claimed to be 
> screwed by Bell during my times of service.
> 
> The only thing that works for me (and yes it is kind of a
> deal with the 
> devil) was to get Rogers and then host my email with
> another company.  And 
> the only way to get competitive pricing from Rogers is to
> threaten to quit 
> once a year to get a "customer retention" deal.  And
> yes, every time I 
> call, I feel a little bit dirty having to deal with the
> devil.
> 
> 
> Good luck with what ever you choose.  I have not found
> a satisfactory 
> solution.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> 
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, james terris wrote:
> 
> > I also recommend teksavvy.
> >
> > --- On Wed, 12/23/09, Garth Boyd <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Garth Boyd <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [oclug] Sympatico update
> >> To: "General Membership Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 8:10 AM
> >> I would strongly advise AGAINST CIA,
> >> 3web, Cybersurf and any of the
> >> other names they go by.
> >>
> >> Check with the BBB first. Also check at
> DSLreports.com.
> >>
> >> I was with them (not by choice, they purchased the
> ISP I
> >> was with) and
> >> it was a total disaster.
> >>
> >> I recommend teksavvy. They know how to run a
> business.
> >>
> >> G
> >>
> >> 2009/12/22 Jean-Francois Messier <[email protected]>:
> >>> ....or get yourself an email account which is
> not
> >> dependent on your ISP.
> >>> I have my own domain name hosted in Arizona
> >> (GoDaddy.com), and it works
> >>> with all ISP's I had over the years.
> >>>
> >>> Now, switching to another ISP entirely is
> another
> >> option. Sympatico is
> >>> known to be more expensive than many others, I
> use
> >> CIA.COM (3web.com)
> >>> and I'm rather happy with them. No
> download/upload
> >> cap, a static IP is
> >>> available, and no fuss, it works just fine. I
> may not
> >> have the 5 MBPS
> >>> that Bell wants to promise me, but thisis
> likely
> >> related to the distance
> >>> with the POS than the actual service.
> >>>
> >>> One thing to do is to test your performance
> using
> >> speedtest.com. Of
> >>> course, you won't know the difference until
> you
> >> switch, but for $10 less
> >>> per month, it's worth it any time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> JF
> >>>
> >>> http://www.franconerd.com
> >>> http://www.messier.ca
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: [oclug] Sympatico update
> >>> From: Mike <[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Tue, December 22, 2009 9:03 pm
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>>
> >>> Just had an automated phone message from Bell
> >>>
> >>> They are switching mail servers (January 4)
>  the new
> >> servers are pophm
> >>> and
> >>> smtphm  (hm for Hotmail)
> >>>
> >>> I tried to get the needed info from the
> Outlook and
> >> Mac instructions
> >>> they give
> >>> but it keeps failing on password.
> >>>
> >>> I looked into it a bit more and it looks like
> it is
> >> wanting a windows
> >>> live
> >>> login
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone have a work around,  or is it
> time to
> >> find a new ISP?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Collector of vintage computers http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> OCLUG general discussion list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> OCLUG general discussion list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> - Garth
> >> --
> >> OCLUG general discussion list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
> >>
> > --
> > OCLUG general discussion list
> > [email protected]
> > http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
> >
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> -- 
> OCLUG general discussion list
> [email protected]
> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
> 


      
-- 
OCLUG general discussion list
[email protected]
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.