Re: Sympatico update
james terris <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Years ago, the town house that I was moving to could not get dsl service (I can't remember the exact reason but it wasn't line problems). The ISP I was trying to subscribe with told me that getting Bell to fix the problem for them was going to be difficult and take quite a while but if I signed up with Sympatico first they would fix the problem quickly since I was a Sympatico customer at that point. After they fixed it I was able to switch over to the other ISP... lol --- On Wed, 12/23/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [oclug] Sympatico update > To: "General Membership Discussion List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 9:42 AM > I was in the same boat as > Garth. It was a total disaster with me as well. > Billing me when I had no service. Avoid 3web, > cybersurf, etc. > > As for Sympatico, my father-in-law is attempting to upgrade > from dial-up > to high speed in the new year (yes he is a little behind > the times). He > called his current ISP and they checked his two phone lines > for DSL > service. Both could have the service but there is no > space left in the > DSLAM. So, he called Sympatico. They will sign > him up no problem. How > can that be? What is Bell doing? Are they > keeping space in the DSLAM for > Sympatico and screwing the smaller ISPs? Or maybe > they kick off a > competitor's customer's service to free up a spot for a new > Sympatico > customer? > > I advised him against Symaptico because I think Bell is > scum. However, > Rogers is also scum. > > I have only heard good things about Teksavvy but I believe > they are also > at the mercy of scummy Bell with regards to the DSLAM and > would > potentially put him in the same boat as I was in with (in > order) Magma, > IStop, Cybersurf (bought customers from IStop) all of which > claimed to be > screwed by Bell during my times of service. > > The only thing that works for me (and yes it is kind of a > deal with the > devil) was to get Rogers and then host my email with > another company. And > the only way to get competitive pricing from Rogers is to > threaten to quit > once a year to get a "customer retention" deal. And > yes, every time I > call, I feel a little bit dirty having to deal with the > devil. > > > Good luck with what ever you choose. I have not found > a satisfactory > solution. > > Dennis > > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, james terris wrote: > > > I also recommend teksavvy. > > > > --- On Wed, 12/23/09, Garth Boyd <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Garth Boyd <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [oclug] Sympatico update > >> To: "General Membership Discussion List" <[email protected]> > >> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 8:10 AM > >> I would strongly advise AGAINST CIA, > >> 3web, Cybersurf and any of the > >> other names they go by. > >> > >> Check with the BBB first. Also check at > DSLreports.com. > >> > >> I was with them (not by choice, they purchased the > ISP I > >> was with) and > >> it was a total disaster. > >> > >> I recommend teksavvy. They know how to run a > business. > >> > >> G > >> > >> 2009/12/22 Jean-Francois Messier <[email protected]>: > >>> ....or get yourself an email account which is > not > >> dependent on your ISP. > >>> I have my own domain name hosted in Arizona > >> (GoDaddy.com), and it works > >>> with all ISP's I had over the years. > >>> > >>> Now, switching to another ISP entirely is > another > >> option. Sympatico is > >>> known to be more expensive than many others, I > use > >> CIA.COM (3web.com) > >>> and I'm rather happy with them. No > download/upload > >> cap, a static IP is > >>> available, and no fuss, it works just fine. I > may not > >> have the 5 MBPS > >>> that Bell wants to promise me, but thisis > likely > >> related to the distance > >>> with the POS than the actual service. > >>> > >>> One thing to do is to test your performance > using > >> speedtest.com. Of > >>> course, you won't know the difference until > you > >> switch, but for $10 less > >>> per month, it's worth it any time. > >>> > >>> > >>> JF > >>> > >>> http://www.franconerd.com > >>> http://www.messier.ca > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------- Original Message -------- > >>> Subject: [oclug] Sympatico update > >>> From: Mike <[email protected]> > >>> Date: Tue, December 22, 2009 9:03 pm > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> > >>> Just had an automated phone message from Bell > >>> > >>> They are switching mail servers (January 4) > the new > >> servers are pophm > >>> and > >>> smtphm (hm for Hotmail) > >>> > >>> I tried to get the needed info from the > Outlook and > >> Mac instructions > >>> they give > >>> but it keeps failing on password. > >>> > >>> I looked into it a bit more and it looks like > it is > >> wanting a windows > >>> live > >>> login > >>> > >>> Does anyone have a work around, or is it > time to > >> find a new ISP? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Collector of vintage computers http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> OCLUG general discussion list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug > >>> > >>> -- > >>> OCLUG general discussion list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> - Garth > >> -- > >> OCLUG general discussion list > >> [email protected] > >> http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug > >> > > -- > > OCLUG general discussion list > > [email protected] > > http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > -- > OCLUG general discussion list > [email protected] > http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug > -- OCLUG general discussion list [email protected] http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug