Re: UBB Fight
Martin Settle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess I no longer believe in catering to the lowest common > denominator. Bandwidth is cheap today, we all run GUIs and can run GUI > email clients that can display html emails. Evolve, upgrade... or be > left behind. > That's an interesting comment, given the original theme of the thread. What do we do when bandwidth is no longer cheap? I think UBB is a very important issue, and the current framing of the CRTC consultation is highly problematic. The stated 'fairness' principle that 'light' users of small ISPs should not subsidize 'heavy' users is in complete contradiction to the idea of a competitive broadband market that meets the diverse needs of Canadians. I have a plan with Teksavvy not because they give me a bit download limit but because they allow me to run my own servers -- I haven't yet used more than 25GB per month. If my choice to pay for a service that allows me to run my own servers also happens to allow other people to use more gigabytes than me, then Teksavvy should be rewarded for creating a product and pricing mix that works. Why should CRTC deem that to be an unfair consumer relationship? Forcing Teksavvy (and others) to duplicate the product/price mix of the big boys will only ensure that, in the long run, we'll all want to send text-only e-mails! Marti. -- OCLUG general discussion list [email protected] http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug