Re: dd
Stephen Gregory <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.ottawa.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ5K_5pn9iu3px1=8r8H-DoRwAkN9MVt-gUixoHkz1VHC_9ZLw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/sda5 or > > dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/sdc9. > > Can someone give me some guidance on this? Thanks in advance. It is easier and faster to use cp -a. The backup is more flexible as it can be written to any device as long as there is enough free space. Using dd both source and destination have to be the same. Specifically if my 500GB drive files, I can be back up and running on a 120GB drive I happen to have sitting around. Using cp will show file system errors. DD will happily copy corrupt data and not tell you. CP can be used on a live system. DD can only be used on unmounted or read only file systems. That said if you are going to use cp you should use the excellent rsnapshot instead. Rsnapshot uses rsync and hard links to make full backups. I use rsnapshot to make hourly snapshots during working hours, as well as daily, weekly, monthly snapshots. The only benefit dd gives is a copy of the boot block. Filesystems, and partitions are trivial to recreate. And cp insures you have a backup of you data. -- sg -- OCLUG general discussion list [email protected] http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug