Re: tcp_wrapper around non-libwrap services, say synergy+?

Anton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.user-groups.linux.singapore
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-security-4/iptables-vs-hosts-deny-276580/

On 6 June 2010 19:39, Junhao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Just a quick check: can tcp_wrapper be used on services not linked to
> libwrap? I am trying to secure synergy+, maybe by wrapping it around
> tcp_wrapper, but not having much success. Not even sure whether that is
> possible, since synergy+ does not understand tcp_wrapper.
>
> Any idea how to do this? Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Junhao
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUGS Mailing list - [email protected]
> List FAQ: http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq
> Info page: http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
> To unsubscribe send an empty email to: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
LUGS Mailing list - [email protected]
List FAQ: http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq
Info page: http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
To unsubscribe send an empty email to: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.