Re: tcp_wrapper around non-libwrap services, say synergy+?
Anton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.user-groups.linux.singapore |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-security-4/iptables-vs-hosts-deny-276580/ On 6 June 2010 19:39, Junhao <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > Just a quick check: can tcp_wrapper be used on services not linked to > libwrap? I am trying to secure synergy+, maybe by wrapping it around > tcp_wrapper, but not having much success. Not even sure whether that is > possible, since synergy+ does not understand tcp_wrapper. > > Any idea how to do this? Thanks! > > Regards, > Junhao > > _______________________________________________ > LUGS Mailing list - [email protected] > List FAQ: http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq > Info page: http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet > To unsubscribe send an empty email to: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ LUGS Mailing list - [email protected] List FAQ: http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq Info page: http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet To unsubscribe send an empty email to: [email protected]