Re: Revelation 3:20

Attila wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:21:16 -0700, Samuel Spade
> >Attila wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:32:58 -0700, Samuel Spade
> >> >Attila wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 12 Jul 2026 14:17:25 -0500, Dawn Flood
> >> >> >On 7/10/2026 12:54 PM, Samuel Spade wrote:
> >> >> >> Dawn Flood <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 7/9/2026 2:32 AM, Andrew wrote:
> >> >> >>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> When one starts picking fights with the Universe, the result seems to
> >> >> >>>>> be an inevitable one.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Dawn
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> It is futile to fight against the truth. Which
> >> >> >>>> explains why atheists have so much trouble.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The only trouble that I am having in my life right now is with some back
> >> >> >>> taxes that I owe to the Internal Revenue Service.  With gas prices going
> >> >> >>> up, down and then back up (just when we get caught up on things), Jesus
> >> >> >>> is offering me no help.  All that you claim is that when I am, finally,
> >> >> >>> dead, I can have this wonderful, blissful (and, "sex free"?) life!!
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Dawn
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> His Noodliness promises abundant sex in the hereafter.
> >> >> >> Everyone gets a hot new bod, and for those of that persuasion
> >> >> >> you can gender-bend at will.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> There's a reason why Jesus said marriage is no longer binding
> >> >> >> Up There.  It'll be like an eternal Summer of '67 in Frisco.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Delicious!!
> >> >> 
> >> >> Since nature intended to use sex as reproduction in order to
> >> >> continue the species if there is sex in heaven it would
> >> >> follow  angels can get pregnant.  Otherwise what is the
> >> >> point?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >If you have to ask, you'll never understand.
> >> 
> >> Give me some verified facts and I can try.
> >
> >
> >Animals love sex.  You'll have to verify it yourself.
> 
> Sure we do.  But why?

We evolved that way.  If there were a heaven, and we
didn't take that sexual nature with us, we wouldn't be
us.  We would be a different thing.


> >Why should resurrected spiritual animals be any
> >different?
> 
> I have yet to see any evidence that supports anything
> spiritual being real.  Therefore I consider the subject
> imaginary.  That includes "resurrected".
> 
> >
> >I also testify that angels do get preggy.
> 
> How do you know this?  Do you have evidence angels exist?
> Does abortion exist in heaven?  Child support?  Are these
> angels married or all of their children bastards?  How do
> you get a heavenly divorce because it is well known that no
> lawyers, like politician, ever go there?

Sigh.

I just know.  You, however, are not allowed to know.
Just think of it as Holy Hyperpasta Mysteries.  Verify
*that* in your Funk & Wagnall's.


> >> >>  If it is for fun would a candy bar give the same
> >> >> result with a lot less trouble?
> >> >
> >> >No.
> >> 
> >> How do you know?
> >
> >It's hard to have sex with a candy bar.  It's more
> >anatomically feasible for women, but candy bars with
> >peanuts are not recommended.  You want something that
> >melts in your muffin, not in your hand.
> 
> I see the concept of hypothetical does not exist in your
> world.

Atilla, I've already told you too much.  You don't
have the proper clearances.