Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:15:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:04:05 -0400, Attila <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:28:19 -0400, Vincent Maycock ><[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:42:08 -0400, Attila <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:23:21 -0400, Vincent Maycock >>><[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:13:37 -0700, "Andrew" >>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>><snip> >>>>>>> I consider most all atheists as friend, because they >>>>>>> have always helped strengthen my faith. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew, >>>>>> >>>>>> If you truly believe, then continue! >>>>> >>>>>I truly believe what is supported by 'rock solid science'. >>>> >>>>If it's a fact, as you seem to imply here, is it best described as a >>>>"belief"? >>> >>>He constantly asserts his beliefs as if they are fact. >> >>He also refers to them as "beliefs" though (see the above quoted >>text). He wants the approval of science ("facts") as well as the >>approval of God ("faith"), so he ends up just really confused. > >Which is why science never addresses religion. The two are >mutually exclusive. You're too kind. The scientific method has disproved religion (although I doubt anyone would need science for that; everyday life disproves religion all on its own).