Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

Vincent Maycock <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:04:23 -0400
Newsgroups alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:07:16 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote:   
>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>> I consider most all atheists as friend, because they
>>>>>>>>  have always helped strengthen my faith.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Andrew,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you truly believe, then continue!  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I truly believe what is supported by 'rock solid science'. 
>>>>>
>>>>>If it's a fact, as you seem to imply here, is it best described as a
>>>>>"belief"?
>>>>
>>>>He constantly asserts his beliefs as if they are fact.
>>>
>>>He also refers to them as "beliefs" though (see the above quoted
>>>text).  He wants the approval of science ("facts") as well as the
>>>approval of God ("faith"), so he ends up just really confused. 
>> 
>> Which is why science never addresses religion.  The two are
>> mutually exclusive.
>> 
>>>>>>If atheists believe otherwise, then I respect their right
>>>>>>to do so. Nevertheless, I would kindly point out their
>>>>>>foolishness.
>>>>>
>>>>>What do you expect to happen when you "kindly" do so? 
>>>>>
>>>>>>> As long as you respect the rights of others to disagree 
>>>>>>> and even not to believe at all, then there are no issues!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I note that atheists will generally believe whatever the 
>>>>>>consensus.says, even though what they believe may be
>>>>>>different than 'rock solid science'.
>>>>>
>>>>>What separates the consensus from "rock solid science"?
>>>>
>>>>What is his "rock hard science"?
>>>
>>>Nothing.  He just likes the way the phrase sounds. 
>
>The reason you folk denigrate the concept of 
>"rock solid science" 

More like denigrating your use of the phrase.   

>is because you hold your
>belief as to what the consensus tells you to be 
>of greater worth than empirical science. Even
>greater than > the established laws of science!
>
>Such as: *The Law of Biogenesis*
>
>      Which tells us that life comes only
>      from pre-existing life, and that of
>      its own kind
>
>     No exceptions ever >Except in the
>     fantasies of those who believe that 
>     fantasy is greater than science.

*The Law of no God Being There*:  Life hasn't been seen to come from a
god -- no exceptions ever, except in creationist fantasies where they
give only lip service to science and then retreat to their
pseudoscientific attacks on real science.