Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:04:23 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:07:16 -0700, "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >> Vincent Maycock wrote: >>> Attila wrote: >>>> Vincent Maycock wrote: >>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> I consider most all atheists as friend, because they >>>>>>>> have always helped strengthen my faith. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrew, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you truly believe, then continue! >>>>>> >>>>>>I truly believe what is supported by 'rock solid science'. >>>>> >>>>>If it's a fact, as you seem to imply here, is it best described as a >>>>>"belief"? >>>> >>>>He constantly asserts his beliefs as if they are fact. >>> >>>He also refers to them as "beliefs" though (see the above quoted >>>text). He wants the approval of science ("facts") as well as the >>>approval of God ("faith"), so he ends up just really confused. >> >> Which is why science never addresses religion. The two are >> mutually exclusive. >> >>>>>>If atheists believe otherwise, then I respect their right >>>>>>to do so. Nevertheless, I would kindly point out their >>>>>>foolishness. >>>>> >>>>>What do you expect to happen when you "kindly" do so? >>>>> >>>>>>> As long as you respect the rights of others to disagree >>>>>>> and even not to believe at all, then there are no issues!! >>>>>> >>>>>>I note that atheists will generally believe whatever the >>>>>>consensus.says, even though what they believe may be >>>>>>different than 'rock solid science'. >>>>> >>>>>What separates the consensus from "rock solid science"? >>>> >>>>What is his "rock hard science"? >>> >>>Nothing. He just likes the way the phrase sounds. > >The reason you folk denigrate the concept of >"rock solid science" More like denigrating your use of the phrase. >is because you hold your >belief as to what the consensus tells you to be >of greater worth than empirical science. Even >greater than > the established laws of science! > >Such as: *The Law of Biogenesis* > > Which tells us that life comes only > from pre-existing life, and that of > its own kind > > No exceptions ever >Except in the > fantasies of those who believe that > fantasy is greater than science. *The Law of no God Being There*: Life hasn't been seen to come from a god -- no exceptions ever, except in creationist fantasies where they give only lip service to science and then retreat to their pseudoscientific attacks on real science.