Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:07:16 -0700, "Andrew"
<[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote:   
>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>> I consider most all atheists as friend, because they
>>>>>>>>  have always helped strengthen my faith.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Andrew,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you truly believe, then continue!  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I truly believe what is supported by 'rock solid science'. 
>>>>>
>>>>>If it's a fact, as you seem to imply here, is it best described as a
>>>>>"belief"?
>>>>
>>>>He constantly asserts his beliefs as if they are fact.
>>>
>>>He also refers to them as "beliefs" though (see the above quoted
>>>text).  He wants the approval of science ("facts") as well as the
>>>approval of God ("faith"), so he ends up just really confused. 
>> 
>> Which is why science never addresses religion.  The two are
>> mutually exclusive.
>> 
>>>>>>If atheists believe otherwise, then I respect their right
>>>>>>to do so. Nevertheless, I would kindly point out their
>>>>>>foolishness.
>>>>>
>>>>>What do you expect to happen when you "kindly" do so? 
>>>>>
>>>>>>> As long as you respect the rights of others to disagree 
>>>>>>> and even not to believe at all, then there are no issues!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I note that atheists will generally believe whatever the 
>>>>>>consensus.says, even though what they believe may be
>>>>>>different than 'rock solid science'.
>>>>>
>>>>>What separates the consensus from "rock solid science"?
>>>>
>>>>What is his "rock hard science"?
>>>
>>>Nothing.  He just likes the way the phrase sounds. 
>
>The reason you folk denigrate the concept of 
>"rock solid science" is because you hold your
>belief as to what the consensus tells you to be 
>of greater worth than empirical science. Even
>greater than > the established laws of science!

Just what could that be?

>
>Such as: *The Law of Biogenesis*
>
>      Which tells us that life comes only
>      from pre-existing life, and that of
>      its own kind
>
>     No exceptions ever

I see nothing wrong with that.  The law does not include any
fantasies, in fact there are very few laws that include
fantasies.  That is left to superstitions.

>Except in the
>     fantasies of those who believe that 
>     fantasy is greater than science.

Now you stepping out of the arena of science and into the
arena of superstition where anything at all is possible.

-- 


Every person in the US is here either  
legally or illegally. Those that are 
here illegally should be afraid.  
Be very afraid.  It does not matter 
how long you have been here.  It does 
not matter why you are here. It does not 
matter what you have done legally while you 
were here. It does not matter what any 
relative may have done while you were here. 
It only matters that you are here illegally. 
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer 
but we will find you and we will deport you. 
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process:
Q. Are you here legally?  If so, where is 
the documentation to establish that?

I support ending birthright citizenship

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting 
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

AA 966